Industry leaders criticise level of gambling licence fees

01 March 2007 by
Industry leaders criticise level of gambling licence fees

Industry leaders have expressed disappointment at the high level of gambling licence fees set by the Government.

The Gambling (Premises Licence) (Fees) Regulations 2007, tabled in Parliament on 21 February, shows only a modest decrease from the fees proposed in last year, which were labelled "preposterous" by Business in Sport and Leisure (BISL).

The BISL has urged ministers to stress to local authorities that these levels are maximum fees and should not be used as a barometer of what must be charged.

Brigid Simmonds, chief executive of the industry group, said: "It makes no sense for gambling premises licence fees to be so significantly higher than those for liquor licensing as the two regulatory regimes are very similar.

"In his review of licensing fees, Sir Les Elton made clear that fees should only cover the cost of licensing and not any subsidiary local authority function. We are disappointed that this has not been reflected in the fee levels set for gambling."

Gambling proposals outlined by DCMS >>

Gambling and the law >>

Stakes raised for pub operators under new gambling regime >>

Government under pressure to review Manchester super casino decision >>

By Daniel Thomas

E-mail your comments to Daniel Thomas]( leaders call gambling licence fees 'preposterous') here.

[The Caterer Blog]( Catch up with more news and gossip on the Caterer Blog here
[Newswire For the latest hospitality news, sign up for our e-mail news alerts.
The Caterer Breakfast Briefing Email

Start the working day with The Caterer’s free breakfast briefing email

Sign Up and manage your preferences below

Check mark icon
Thank you

You have successfully signed up for the Caterer Breakfast Briefing Email and will hear from us soon!

Jacobs Media Group is honoured to be the recipient of the 2020 Queen's Award for Enterprise.

The highest official awards for UK businesses since being established by royal warrant in 1965. Read more.


Ad Blocker detected

We have noticed you are using an adblocker and – although we support freedom of choice – we would like to ask you to enable ads on our site. They are an important revenue source which supports free access of our website's content, especially during the COVID-19 crisis.

trade tracker pixel tracking